Category: America

Home America
How Federal, State, and Industry Checks Keep Milk Safe During an FDA Lab Pause
Post

How Federal, State, and Industry Checks Keep Milk Safe During an FDA Lab Pause

Federal officials have paused the Food and Drug Administration’s proficiency-testing program—the twice-a-year audit that checks whether milk laboratories around the country can still hit federally defined targets—while they move the work to a new site. The daily safeguards that actually decide whether a tanker can unload or a production lot can ship, however, remain fully in force. Processing plants continue to screen every load for drug residues, run microbial counts after pasteurization and hold product until results clear. State public-health labs still pull independent samples, can order recalls and feed data to the national residue database. Because those two front-line layers are unchanged, food-safety scientists and regulators agree that the risk to consumers has not increased despite the temporary gap in federal audit rounds.

Post

USDA Drops Salmonella Limits After Big Poultry Donation

Millions of Americans already battle salmonella each year, yet a long-promised USDA rule designed to cut infections by a quarter has been shelved after an unprecedented $5 million inauguration donation from one of the nation’s largest chicken processors. Internal records, lobbying filings and CDC data reveal how economic influence, regulatory hesitation and antibiotic-resistant bacteria converged to keep stricter standards off the books—leaving consumers, doctors and watchdogs asking who really protects the dinner plate when public health and corporate power collide.

Post

Public Health Experts Warn Oversight Unraveling

The agency founded to guard Americans from quack cures has quietly mothballed its decades‑old milk testing program, leaving state labs scrambling just as bird flu sweeps U.S. dairies. Inside the FDA, thousands of scientists have been pink‑slipped under a cost‑cutting order overseen by Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the environmental lawyer whose anti‑vaccine activism already shadows a nationwide measles surge. Historians see a grim symmetry: an agency born of the 1906 snake‑oil scandals now curbed by a champion of raw milk and “natural immunity.” Industry experts warn that without federal proficiency checks, pathogens from Listeria to H5N1 could slip into grocery coolers, forcing consumers to trust a watchdog with the teeth pulled.

Post

Kilmar Abrego Garcia and America’s Slide into Authoritarianism

In Trump's America, citizenship has become disturbingly meaningless. The horrifying case of Kilmar Abrego Garcia illustrates how swiftly constitutional protections vanish when executive power goes unchecked. Denied legal counsel, blocked from courts, and stripped of his right to due process, Garcia's story is a chilling warning: no citizen is safe if the government can arbitrarily erase your rights. As the administration moves closer to openly targeting political dissenters, human rights activists, and anyone branded an "agitator," Americans must confront the terrifying truth—today it's Garcia, tomorrow it could easily be you.

Post

The Comey Pattern: Examining Extraordinary Prosecutorial Actions Against Prominent Women

When James Comey prosecuted Martha Stewart in 2003 using what legal scholars called an "audacious legal theory," and when he made unprecedented public interventions in the Hillary Clinton email investigation in 2016, he claimed to be upholding institutional integrity. But a comprehensive examination of court records, Inspector General reports, and expert analysis reveals a troubling pattern: Comey's most aggressive and procedurally irregular actions have disproportionately targeted high-profile women, generating enormous reputational damage regardless of legal outcomes. From the novel securities fraud charge against Stewart—later dismissed by a judge—to the "extraordinary and insubordinate" press conferences and letters about Clinton that violated Justice Department norms, Comey's decisions in these cases drew sustained criticism from legal experts across the political spectrum. The Department of Justice Inspector General found that Comey's handling of the Clinton investigation included "inappropriate commentary about uncharged conduct" and represented departures from "well-established department policies" for which he offered no "persuasive basis." This investigation examines whether Comey's most controversial prosecutorial decisions reveal a pattern of disproportionate intensity, extraordinary publicity, and institutional norm violations that consistently affected prominent women—raising fundamental questions about equality before the law and the appropriate use of prosecutorial discretion.