Kansas's Legislative Coordinating Council approved $2.775 billion in public subsidies for a new Chiefs stadium in a 30-minute closed-door meeting—the largest stadium subsidy in American history. The Hunt family, worth $6.53 billion, will pay 40 percent of construction costs while retaining 100 percent ownership and all revenue streams. Eighty-three percent of economists oppose such subsidies, and Kansas's own failed STAR bonds projects predicted this disaster. The state will finance billionaire infrastructure while ranking 41st in education spending and leaving 150,000 residents without healthcare. Every $15 beer sold will remind taxpayers: they built the stadium, will eventually demolish it, but the Hunt family pockets every dollar.
Category: Politics
Home
Politics
Post
December 4, 2025December 4, 2025America, Conspiracy, Politics, Presidency
People Enabling Trump. Power, Policy & Consequence.
An investigation into the machinery of Donald Trump's second administration reveals how a core group of advisors—Stephen Miller, Pete Hegseth, Susie Wiles, Dan Scavino, Karoline Leavitt, James Blair, and Vince Haley—are translating presidential authority into concrete policy through immigration enforcement, military operations, personnel control, and institutional reorganization. Miller's documented influence has produced more than 200 executive orders targeting immigration, while Hegseth faces bipartisan congressional scrutiny over a Pentagon Inspector General report finding he violated protocols by sharing classified information on Signal and over controversial Caribbean military strikes. Scavino now controls "almost all positions in government" through the Presidential Personnel Office. This examination of Trump's first eleven months back in office documents how loyalty-based staffing, agency reorganizations, and centralized decision-making are reshaping federal institutions in ways that may outlast this administration.
Post
November 27, 2025November 30, 2025America, Conspiracy, Fascism, Politics, Presidency
Examining the Implications of Mass Leadership Dismissals Under the Trump Administration
Between January and November 2025, the Trump administration dismissed or forced into retirement more than a dozen senior military officers in what represents the most extensive peacetime purge of military leadership in modern American history. The dismissals included the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff—removed less than 17 months into his statutory four-year term—the first woman to serve on the Joint Chiefs, the commanders of the Coast Guard, Navy SEALs, Navy Reserve, U.S. Cyber Command, and the National Security Agency, as well as all three service judge advocates general simultaneously.
Five former secretaries of defense, representing both Republican and Democratic administrations, issued an extraordinary joint letter calling for congressional hearings, warning that the dismissals raised "troubling questions about the administration's desire to politicize the military" and removed legal constraints on presidential power. The scale and manner of these actions—combined with the administration's explicit emphasis on personal loyalty and the firing of officers who provided intelligence assessments contradicting presidential claims—threaten the apolitical character of the U.S. military that has been a cornerstone of American democracy for more than two centuries.
This analysis examines the documented facts of these dismissals, their implications for civil-military relations, national security effectiveness, and constitutional governance, and what these unprecedented actions reveal about the evolving relationship between civilian and military authority in the United States. The article draws on official government statements, news reports from multiple sources, congressional testimony, and analysis from former defense officials to provide a comprehensive assessment of a critical juncture in American military history.
Post
Kansas is at a Crossroads as Raids, Bills increase the High Cost of Criminalizing THC
Kansas raids dozens of hemp shops while considering legalization bills that could generate $20-50 million annually. The state arrests nearly 5,000 people yearly for cannabis possession at a cost of $7-54 million in criminal justice expenses—money that could fund schools, roads, or treatment programs instead. Meanwhile, legislators debate three competing approaches: medical cannabis (SB 294), adult-use regulation (HB 2405), or tighter hemp restrictions (SB 292). The math is clear: prohibition costs Kansas taxpayers millions while generating zero revenue and saddling thousands with criminal records that reduce lifetime earnings. The question isn't whether Kansas can afford to reform—it's whether Kansas can afford not to.
Post
Selective Outrage: What the George Floyd Mockery and Charlie Kirk Martyrdom Reveal About Race, Power, and American Empathy
When Charlie Kirk was killed in September 2025, a coordinated campaign backed by government officials led to over 150 people being targeted for termination within nine days—some fired within hours for merely quoting Kirk's own words. Five years earlier, when George Floyd was killed by police, his death became fodder for Halloween costumes, TikTok reenactments, and memes that circulated widely with scattered, inconsistent consequences. This investigation documents the stark disparity in institutional response: who receives martyrdom versus mockery, whose dignity merits protection, and how systemic racism operates through selective empathy. Drawing on court documents, employment records, and government statements, the article reveals how power—not principle—determines whose death America mourns and whose it tolerates as entertainment.